Branchoria Arnold Sighting Arnold Sighting

A careful look at the pilot report that launched the modern flying saucer era.

What Really Happened During the Nimitz Tic Tac Sighting?

The USS Nimitz “Tic Tac” case is one of the best-known modern UFO or UAP incidents because it combines trained military witnesses, shipboard radar claims, an infrared targeting-pod video, and later official acknowledgement that the footage is real Navy material.

Preview for What Really Happened During the Nimitz Tic Tac Sighting?

Introduction

The case matters because it became a template for the modern UAP debate. It helped move UFO reporting from fringe culture into congressional hearings, Pentagon statements, and scientific arguments about what counts as adequate evidence. It is not a simple “debunked” case, but neither is it strong public proof of alien technology. It is a case where the strongest claim depends on combining witness reports, claimed radar tracks, and later analysis rather than on the short video alone. [Director of National Intelligence]dni.govSource details in endnotes.

Overview image for USS Nimitz Tic Tac video 2004

What happened off Southern California in November 2004?

The incident occurred during pre-deployment training by the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group in the Southern California operating area. A leaked “Tic Tac” executive summary, hosted by DocumentCloud and also mirrored by The Black Vault, describes the broader setting as involving the USS Nimitz, USS Princeton, USS Chafee, USS Higgins and USS Louisville, with aircraft from Carrier Air Wing 11. The document is important because it gives a detailed case narrative, but it is not the same as a fully released, complete official investigative file with all raw radar and sensor data attached. [DocumentCloud]documentcloud.orgDocument Cloud USS Nimitz UFO / UAP Tic Tac ExecutiveDocument Cloud USS Nimitz UFO / UAP Tic Tac Executive

The public chronology centres on 14 November 2004. According to later accounts by David Fravor and Alex Dietrich, their F/A-18F aircraft were diverted from a training mission after USS Princeton operators had detected unusual tracks. CBS News, summarising Fravor’s account and congressional testimony, reported that Princeton’s radar operators had seen “multiple anomalous aerial vehicles” and that Fravor and Dietrich were sent to investigate roughly 100 miles south-west of San Diego. [CBS News]cbsnews.comThe story behind the "Tic Tac" UFO sighting by Navy pilots in 2004 - CBS News…

Fravor’s account is the human centre of the case. He said he and Dietrich, with two weapons systems officers in the back seats of their aircraft, watched a small white object above disturbed water for about five minutes. He described it as white, smooth, wingless and roughly comparable in size to his F/A-18F, with no obvious exhaust plume. He later testified that the object accelerated away rapidly and was detected around 60 miles away less than a minute later. [CBS News]cbsnews.comThe story behind the "Tic Tac" UFO sighting by Navy pilots in 2004 - CBS News…

The “Tic Tac video”, however, was not recorded by Fravor during that initial visual encounter. A later aircraft, associated in public accounts with Lieutenant Commander Chad Underwood, captured the infrared footage known as “FLIR1”. This distinction is crucial: the best-known video is linked to the Nimitz event, but it is not a continuous recording of Fravor’s close visual encounter from start to finish. [Wikipedia]WikipediaPentagon UFO videosPentagon UFO videos

USS Nimitz Tic Tac video 2004 illustration 1

Why the video became famous

The video became famous because it was one of three Navy UAP clips that entered public debate through unauthorised or semi-public circulation before formal Pentagon release. In April 2020, the Department of Defense authorised release of three unclassified Navy videos: one from November 2004 and two from January 2015. The department said the videos had circulated publicly after unauthorised releases in 2007 and 2017, that the Navy had previously acknowledged them as genuine Navy videos, and that the phenomena in them remained characterised as “unidentified”. [U.S. Department of War]defense.govStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War…</span></span></span>(#endnote-1 “Snippet: Statement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War”)
That statement did two things and did not do a third. It confirmed authenticity: the footage was real Navy footage, not a hoax fabricated by outsiders. It confirmed official uncertainty in public wording: the observed phenomena remained unidentified. But it did not confirm that the object was extraterrestrial, that it performed the full range of manoeuvres described in witness accounts, or that all claimed radar data had been publicly verified. [U.S. Department of War]defense.govStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War…</span></span></span>(#endnote-1 “Snippet: Statement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War”)

The footage itself is forward-looking infrared, or FLIR, imagery from a targeting system rather than normal colour video. That matters because the public sees a small, low-resolution shape on a cockpit display, with changing camera modes, target-box behaviour, zoom, sensor movement and aircraft motion all affecting interpretation. The clip can show that the system tracked something not publicly identified, but it cannot by itself supply all the missing variables a reader would want: exact range, object size, atmospheric context, full aircraft track, full sensor metadata and raw radar corroboration. [VICE]vice.comthe skeptics guide to the pentagons ufo videosthe skeptics guide to the pentagons ufo videos

The strongest evidence is not just the clip

The Nimitz case is stronger than a typical blurry UFO video because several types of evidence are claimed to converge. The public record includes named pilots, multiple crew members, a Navy-authenticated infrared video, a leaked case summary, later congressional testimony, and accounts of shipboard radar detections. That combination is why the case continues to be discussed seriously even by people who reject alien conclusions. [CBS News]cbsnews.comThe story behind the "Tic Tac" UFO sighting by Navy pilots in 2004 - CBS News… DocumentCloud The witness evidence is unusually high-profile. Fravor was a Navy commander and squadron commanding officer [documentcloud.org]documentcloud.orgDocument Cloud USS Nimitz UFO / UAP Tic Tac ExecutiveDocument Cloud USS Nimitz UFO / UAP Tic Tac Executive; Dietrich has also publicly discussed the encounter; Fravor later gave a formal statement to the House Oversight Committee. In that statement, he said the Tic Tac object encountered in November 2004 was “far superior” to anything available then, now, or expected in the near future. That is a strong judgement from a qualified pilot, but it is still a judgement based on his experience and the information available to him, not a laboratory identification of the object. [oversight.house.gov]oversight.house.govDavid Fravor Statement for House Oversight CommitteeDavid Fravor Statement for House Oversight Committee

The radar element is the most tantalising and the least publicly complete. Public summaries say USS Princeton operators had tracked anomalous contacts before the intercept, and Fravor’s public accounts include the claim that the object later appeared at the group’s combat air patrol point. Yet the raw radar files and full sensor-chain documentation have not been released in a form that would let independent analysts reconstruct the event from primary data alone. That gap is central to why the case remains contested. [CBS News]cbsnews.comThe story behind the "Tic Tac" UFO sighting by Navy pilots in 2004 - CBS News… Academia The video is therefore best treated as one component in a bundle [academia.edu]academia.eduOpen source on academia.edu., not as the whole case. Supporters of the anomalous interpretation point to the named witnesses, reported radar tracks and apparent sensor capture. Skeptics reply that each part has limitations: memories can compress events, radar systems can mislead or be misinterpreted, and the FLIR clip does not visibly show the most extraordinary acceleration claims. [VICE]vice.comwatch a navy pilot explain his encounter with a ufowatch a navy pilot explain his encounter with a ufo

WATCH: Navy pilot describes encounter with 'Tic Tac' shaped unidentified flying object

Channel: PBS NewsHour · Views: 1.0M · Uploaded: July 2021 · Length: 4 minutes 42 seconds

Open on YouTube

What official investigations have and have not said

The most important official public statement about the video is narrow: the Department of Defense released the historical Navy videos to clear up public misconceptions about whether the circulating footage was real, and said the phenomena remained unidentified. It did not publish a full technical resolution of the 2004 case. [U.S. Department of War]defense.govStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War…</span></span></span>(#endnote-1 “Snippet: Statement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War”)

The 2021 Office of the Director of National Intelligence preliminary assessment placed UAP reporting in a broader government context. It reviewed 144 reports from US government sources covering events from 2004 to 2021, with 80 involving observation by multiple sensors, and said only one had been identified with high confidence as a large deflating balloon while the others remained unexplained at that stage. The report’s date range starting in 2004 is significant because the Nimitz case sits at the beginning of the modern official dataset, but the report does not publicly resolve the Tic Tac case in detail. [Director of National Intelligence]dni.govSource details in endnotes.

NASA’s 2023 independent UAP study is useful for framing the evidence problem rather than for identifying the Nimitz object. The NASA team argued that UAP study requires a rigorous, evidence-based approach and better data acquisition methods. It also highlighted a recurring problem: many UAP reports lack the calibrated, multi-sensor, metadata-rich observations needed for firm scientific conclusions. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govSource details in endnotes.

AARO’s broader historical work has also shifted the debate away from simple mystery narratives and towards verifiable records. Its 2024 historical report reviewed the US government record on UAP and found no verified evidence that any US government investigation, academic-sponsored research or official review had confirmed extraterrestrial technology. That does not identify the Nimitz object, but it does set a cautionary frame for claims that the case proves alien craft or hidden reverse-engineering programmes. [U.S. Department of War]defense.govStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War…</span></span></span>(#endnote-1 “Snippet: Statement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War”)

USS Nimitz Tic Tac video 2004 illustration 2

The skeptical reading of FLIR1

The strongest skeptical argument is not that Fravor and Dietrich fabricated their account. It is that the famous FLIR1 video does not show what many viewers think it shows. Mick West and other skeptical analysts have argued that the Nimitz FLIR object may be a distant aircraft or other ordinary object whose apparent behaviour is shaped by camera tracking, zoom, glare, sensor limitations and missing range information. In a Vice interview, West said he did not know what Fravor saw or what radar operators saw, but argued that the FLIR video itself showed a distant object that was not visibly performing the spectacular manoeuvres described in the pilot story. [VICE]vice.comthe skeptics guide to the pentagons ufo videosthe skeptics guide to the pentagons ufo videos

This matters because many viral retellings merge three different evidential claims into one: the close visual encounter, the radar story, and the FLIR footage. If the video is interpreted in isolation, it is much less dramatic than the full narrative. It shows a small object or heat source on an infrared display; it does not independently prove a wingless craft accelerating at impossible speeds. [VICE]vice.comwatch a navy pilot explain his encounter with a ufowatch a navy pilot explain his encounter with a ufo

The skeptical case is also strengthened by a general point about military sensor data: without range, calibration, full track history and environmental context, apparent speed and shape can be deceptive. Parallax, target-box motion, glare, autofocus and display symbology can make ordinary objects look strange. NASA’s later UAP report made a similar methodological point at a broader level, stressing the need for robust data rather than isolated, ambiguous captures. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govSource details in endnotes.

But the skeptical reading has its own limit. It can reduce the evidential weight of the video, but it does not by itself explain every witness claim or every reported radar track. That is why the fairest conclusion is not “the whole case is solved”, but “the public video is weaker evidence than the full legend suggests”. [VICE]vice.comwatch a navy pilot explain his encounter with a ufowatch a navy pilot explain his encounter with a ufo

SHOCKING TESTIMONY: Former Navy Pilot Describes Infamous 2004 'Tic Tac' UFO Experience

Channel: Forbes Breaking News · Views: 165.7K · Uploaded: July 2023 · Length: 5 minutes

Open on YouTube

The anomalous reading of the case

The anomalous interpretation rests on the whole case bundle. Fravor’s testimony describes a white Tic Tac-shaped object with no wings, markings or visible propulsion; Dietrich and the two weapons systems officers are described as additional airborne witnesses; radar accounts allege unusual tracks before and after the intercept; and the later FLIR footage is treated as a sensor capture of the same or related object. [CBS News]cbsnews.comThe story behind the "Tic Tac" UFO sighting by Navy pilots in 2004 - CBS News…

Researchers sympathetic to the anomalous interpretation have tried to estimate flight characteristics from the Nimitz accounts. A 2019 paper by Kevin Knuth, Robert Powell and Peter Reali considered the 2004 Nimitz encounters among several cases and estimated lower bounds on accelerations reported in anomalous manoeuvres. The value of this work is that it attempts a quantitative treatment; its weakness is that such estimates depend heavily on the accuracy and completeness of the underlying account, especially radar-derived claims that are not publicly available as raw data. [PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govSource details in endnotes.

For supporters, the case is compelling because the mundane explanations feel piecemeal: a distant aircraft might address aspects of the FLIR clip, but not necessarily Fravor’s close visual description or the reported radar behaviour. For skeptics, that is exactly the problem: the strongest version of the case relies on stitching together evidence of uneven quality, some of it second-hand or unavailable for independent review. [VICE]vice.comwatch a navy pilot explain his encounter with a ufowatch a navy pilot explain his encounter with a ufo

The unresolved status therefore does not automatically imply exotic technology. “Unidentified” means not publicly identified on the available evidence. It can include foreign systems, classified US systems, drones, balloons, aircraft, sensor artefacts, natural phenomena, reporting errors, or combinations of several factors. The Nimitz case remains interesting because none of those categories has been publicly demonstrated to close the case. [Director of National Intelligence]dni.govSource details in endnotes.

USS Nimitz Tic Tac video 2004 illustration 3

Common misunderstandings about the Tic Tac video

The first misunderstanding is that the video is a complete record of the whole event. It is not. The video is a short infrared clip from a later aircraft sortie, while the most dramatic human account comes from Fravor and Dietrich’s earlier visual encounter. Treating the clip as if it directly shows every claimed manoeuvre makes the evidence look stronger than it is. [Wikipedia]WikipediaOpen source on wikipedia.org.

The second misunderstanding is that Pentagon release equals Pentagon endorsement of an extraordinary explanation. The Department of Defense confirmed that the videos were genuine Navy videos and said the phenomena remained unidentified; it did not say the object was alien, transmedium, or beyond all human technology. [U.S. Department of War]defense.govStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War…</span></span></span>(#endnote-1 “Snippet: Statement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War”)

The third misunderstanding is that witness credibility alone settles the physics. Military pilots are trained observers, and their testimony deserves serious attention. But aviation history also contains many cases where skilled observers misjudged distance, size, speed or the behaviour of unfamiliar objects under unusual conditions. Credibility raises the value of a report; it does not remove the need for raw data. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govSource details in endnotes.

The fourth misunderstanding is that skeptical analysis has fully explained the whole Nimitz incident. Some skeptical work plausibly challenges dramatic readings of the FLIR clip, but the public record still lacks enough primary sensor data to test all claims. A cautious reader can accept that the video is ambiguous while also accepting that the broader case has not been publicly resolved. [leonarddavid.com]leonarddavid.comdebunking navy ufo videosdebunking navy ufo videos

The 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident | Contact

Channel: Discovery · Views: 1.3M · Uploaded: August 2019 · Length: 3 minutes 2 seconds

Open on YouTube

How to weigh the case today

The fairest way to weigh the USS Nimitz Tic Tac case is to separate the evidence into tiers. The strongest public fact is provenance: the US government acknowledged and released the 2004 Navy video. The next tier is witness testimony: named aviators gave consistent, serious accounts of an unusual object. The weaker public tier is the missing technical record: raw radar data, full sensor metadata, and complete classified analysis are not available in a form that lets outside experts reproduce the event. [U.S. Department of War]defense.govStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War…</span></span></span>(#endnote-1 “Snippet: Statement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release U.S. Department of War”) [CBS News]cbsnews.comThe story behind the "Tic Tac" UFO sighting by Navy pilots in 2004 - CBS News…

That structure leads to a balanced conclusion. The Nimitz case is not just internet folklore; it has credible witnesses, official video provenance and a place in the modern government UAP record. At the same time, the public evidence does not justify the strongest popular claims often attached to it. The video is real, the official public classification remains unidentified, and the broader incident remains unresolved in the public domain. [Director of National Intelligence]dni.govSource details in endnotes.

Its lasting importance is procedural as much as mysterious. The case exposed how poorly even serious UAP incidents can be preserved for later public analysis: fragmented video, disputed radar claims, incomplete chains of custody, stigma around reporting, and heavy classification around sensor systems. That is why later NASA and scientific discussions emphasise calibrated, multi-sensor, reproducible data rather than more dramatic clips. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govSource details in endnotes.

For a case dossier, the USS Nimitz Tic Tac video should therefore be treated as a pivotal but limited artefact. It is central to the 2004 Nimitz incident, but it is not the whole case. It supports the claim that Navy systems recorded something unidentified; it does not, on its own, prove the extraordinary performance described in the broader witness narrative.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

No matched book cards were available for What Really Happened During the Nimitz Tic Tac Sighting?, so this fallback keeps a direct Amazon reading path visible.

Topical books

UFO investigation books

Browse books, explainers and reference titles related to this topic.

Search Amazon

Related search

scientific UFO research books

Browse books, explainers and reference titles related to this topic.

Search Amazon

Related search

UAP investigation books

Browse books, explainers and reference titles related to this topic.

Search Amazon

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA
Browse more on eBay.com

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Browse more on eBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

  1. Source: defense.gov
    Title: U.S. Department of War
    Link: https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/release/article/2165713/statement-by-the-department-of-defense-on-the-release-of-historical-navy-videos/
    Source snippet

    Statement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release | U.S. Department of War...

  2. Source: cbsnews.com
    Title: CBS News
    Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tic-tac-ufo-sighting-uap-video-dave-fravor-alex-dietrich-navy-fighter-pilots-house-testimony/
    Source snippet

    The story behind the "Tic Tac" UFO sighting by Navy pilots in 2004 - CBS News...

  3. Source: vice.com
    Title: the skeptics guide to the pentagons ufo videos
    Link: https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-skeptics-guide-to-the-pentagons-ufo-videos/

  4. Source: oversight.house.gov
    Title: David Fravor Statement for House Oversight Committee
    Link: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/David-Fravor-Statement-for-House-Oversight-Committee.pdf

  5. Source: science.nasa.gov
    Link: https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf

  6. Source: documentcloud.org
    Title: Document Cloud USS Nimitz UFO / UAP Tic Tac Executive
    Link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20743466-nimitz-unredacted/

  7. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Pentagon UFO videos
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos

  8. Source: academia.edu
    Link: https://www.academia.edu/40212818/A_Forensic_Analysis_of_Navy_Carrier_Strike_Group_Elevens_Encounter_with_an_Anomalous_Aerial_Vehicle_ANALYSIS_OF_EVIDENCE_AND_RESULTING_CONCLUSIONS_BY_THE_SCIENTIFIC_COALITION_FOR_UFOLOGY

  9. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7514271/

  10. Source: science.nasa.gov
    Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/

  11. Source: media.defense.gov
    Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF

  12. Source: leonarddavid.com
    Title: debunking navy ufo videos
    Link: https://www.leonarddavid.com/debunking-navy-ufo-videos/

  13. Source: pclt.defense.gov
    Title: 2022 DoD Chief FOIA Officer Report
    Link: https://pclt.defense.gov/Portals/140/FOIA/CFO/2022_DoD_Chief_FOIA_Officer_Report.pdf

  14. Source: comptroller.defense.gov
    Title: RDTE OSD PB 2026
    Link: https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2026/budget_justification/pdfs/03_RDT_and_E/RDTE_OSD_PB_2026.pdf

  15. Source: media.defense.gov
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2023/Apr/26/2003208856/-1/-1/0/1881.PDF

  16. Source: media.defense.gov
    Title: FOIA LOG
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2025/May/30/2003728332/-1/-1/0/FOIA%20LOG%20OCTOBER%201%2C%202024%20-%20DECEMBER%2031%2C%202024%20REDACTED.PDF
    Published: October 1, 2024

  17. Source: media.defense.gov
    Title: T 0055 MARZOLF TIME CRITICAL TARGETING
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2017/Dec/28/2001861683/-1/-1/0/T_0055_MARZOLF_TIME_CRITICAL_TARGETING.PDF

  18. Source: media.defense.gov
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2023/May/04/2003215601/-1/-1/0/1810.PDF

  19. Source: media.defense.gov
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2023/May/04/2003215812/-1/-1/0/2039.PDF

  20. Source: comptroller.defense.gov
    Link: https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2023/budget_justification/pdfs/01_Operation_and_Maintenance/O_M_VOL_1_PART_2/OM_Volume1_Part2.pdf

  21. Source: Wikipedia
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004

  22. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: NASA Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Team
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Unidentified_Anomalous_Phenomena_Independent_Study_Team

  23. Source: oversight.house.gov
    Link: https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-implications-on-national-security-public-safety-and-government-transparency/

  24. Source: oversight.house.gov
    Link: https://oversight.house.gov/release/national-security-subcommittee-to-hold-hearing-on-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena%EF%BF%BC/

  25. Source: docs.house.gov
    Title: By Event.aspx
    Link: https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=116282

  26. Source: aph.gov.au
    Title: Preliminary Assessment UAP 20210625
    Link: https://www.aph.gov.au/-/media/Estimates/fadt/supp2122/add_info/Preliminary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf

  27. Source: history.com
    Title: US S Nimitz ‘Tic Tac’ UFO: Declassified Video
    Link: https://www.history.com/videos/uss-nimitz-tic-tac-ufo-declassified-video

  28. Source: history.com
    Title: uss nimitz 2004 tic tac ufo encounter
    Link: https://www.history.com/articles/uss-nimitz-2004-tic-tac-ufo-encounter

  29. Source: academia.edu
    Link: https://www.academia.edu/121745699/Estimating_Flight_Characteristics_of_Anomalous_Unidentified_Aerial_Vehicles_in_the_2004_Nimitz_Encounter

  30. Source: leonarddavid.com
    Link: https://www.leonarddavid.com/unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-implications-on-national-security-public-safety-and-government-transparency/

  31. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/

  32. Source: vice.com
    Title: watch a navy pilot explain his encounter with a ufo
    Link: https://www.vice.com/en/article/watch-a-navy-pilot-explain-his-encounter-with-a-ufo/

  33. Source: documentcloud.org
    Link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20973238-210625_odni-prelminary-assessment-uap/

  34. Source: dni.gov
    Link: https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf

  35. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
    Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/baass/TIC_TAC_UFO_EXECUTIVE_REPORT_1526682843046_42960218_ver1.0.pdf

  36. Source: reddit.com
    Title: office of the director of national intelligence
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/o7wpjg/office_of_the_director_of_national_intelligence/

  37. Source: cbsnews.com
    Title: navy ufo sighting 60 minutes 2021 05 16
    Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/navy-ufo-sighting-60-minutes-2021-05-16/

  38. Source: cbsnews.com
    Title: nasa ufo report uap study
    Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nasa-ufo-report-uap-study/

  39. Source: coffeeordie.com
    Title: nimitz tic tac
    Link: https://www.coffeeordie.com/article/nimitz-tic-tac

  40. Source: abcnews.com
    Link: https://abcnews.com/US/navy-pilot-recalls-encounter-ufo-unlike/story?id=51856514

Additional References

  1. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz0p6QXHh9E
    Source snippet

    Navy pilot describes encounter with 'Tic Tac' shaped unidentified flying object...

  2. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlrz84nEXtk
    Source snippet

    The 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident | Contact...

  3. Source: arxiv.org
    Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566

  4. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBtMbBPzqHY
    Source snippet

    SHOCKING TESTIMONY: Former Navy Pilot Describes Infamous 2004 'Tic Tac' UFO Experience...

  5. Source: researchgate.net
    Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403025531_Tic_Tac_and_Beyond_UAP_Sightings_Reverse-Engineered_Alien_Tech_and_the_Corporate-Government_Conspiracy

  6. Source: researchgate.net
    Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353539589_Analysis_of_ODNI_Preliminary_Assessment_Unidentified_Aerial_Phenomena

  7. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1dgc8od/are_there_good_scientific_explanations_for_ufo/

  8. Source: rv-times.com
    Link: https://rv-times.com/2023/07/26/close-encounters-with-ufos-described-to-congressional-committee/

  9. Source: elitefasion.com
    Link: https://elitefasion.com/uap-ufo-records/fravor-tic-tac-testimony

  10. Source: wired.com
    Link: https://www.wired.com/story/does-it-matter-that-the-dod-released-those-ufo-videos

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Related pages 106

More on this topic 3